Flag Counter

Thursday, January 3, 2013

Pilots killed as Red Wings Tu-204 crashes on Moscow highway

Three cockpit crew and a flight attendant have been killed after a Red Wings Tupolev Tu-204 crashed on a road near Moscow Vnukovo airport.

Four other cabin crew, the only other occupants of the aircraft, were injured in the accident, according to the Russian emergency services ministry.

The aircraft had been operating as flight 9268, a ferry service, from Pardubice in the Czech Republic when it came down at 16:36.

Russia's Interstate Aviation Committee has identified the airframe involved as bearing registration RA-64047.

It says it has sent a specialist team to the scene of the crash.

 Ivan Sekretarev - PA
 Copyright: Ivan Sekretarev - PA

Recorded surveillance data indicates that the twinjet passed north of the airport before turning right to approach Vnukovo's runway 19.

Some 200m beyond the far end of the runway is a major arterial road, the M3 highway, into the southwest of Moscow.

Images from the scene indicate that the aircraft, on a southwest heading, struck an embankment on the northern side of the highway, near an overhead gantry which crosses multiple lanes.

The Tu-204's cockpit broke away and came to rest on the highway.

Weather information for the time of the accident indicates light snow showers but good visibility.
The crash is the first fatal loss of a Tu-204. Another Tu-204, operated by Aviastar-Tu, was destroyed in March 2010, when it strayed off the approach path to Moscow Domodedovo and broke up in a forest. It was also carrying just eight people but all survived the crash.


flightglobal.com

Tu-204 directive warns pilots to check thrust-reverse status

Russian authorities have ordered immediate action by Tupolev Tu-204 operators in the wake of two runway overruns by Red Wings aircraft, including the fatal accident at Moscow Vnukovo.

Federal aviation authority Rosaviatsia has issued an airworthiness directive highlighting the 29 December crash at Vnukovo - in which five crew members were killed - and an incident on 20 December during which another Red Wings Tu-204 rolled beyond the end of the runway while landing at Novosibirsk.

Rosaviatsia says Tupolev has developed a technical response for Tu-204 and Tu-214 twinjets, powered by Aviadvigatel PS-90 engines, which centres on lubricating mechanisms linked to limit-switches on the landing-gear, notably during low-temperature operations.

But the authority has also ordered a temporary amendment to the aircraft operating manual regarding the operation of thrust-reversers on the type.

It points out that the crew should check for an early indication that the reverser system is operating correctly.

After touchdown, with the throttle reduced to idle and the spoilers deployed, the thrust-reverse control lever should normally be moved, over the course of 1-2s, initially to the 'small reverse' position.

The engine instrument panel should indicate, in yellow text, that the thrust-reverse lock has opened and then - with the symbol 'REV' in green text - that the reverser is active, says the manual.

Once the crew has confirmed this, and the correct alignment with the runway, the nose should be lowered and maximum reverse-thrust engaged. When the speed has reduced to 70-75kt (130-140km/h) the crew should restore the reverser control to the 'small reverse' position and, at about 25kt, disengage it.

But the operating manual specifically warns the crew to check that the reverser is active, with the presence of the green 'REV' indication, before committing to maximum reverse thrust.

If the indication does not appear after the control lever has been moved to the 'small reverse' position, the warning says, the pilots should "immediately" disengage the lever and continue the roll-out without reverse thrust.

The Novosibirsk incident involved a Red Wings Tu-204 registered RA-64049, which had arrived after flight WZ123 from Moscow Vnukovo.

Red Wings' flight WZ9268, a ferry service from Pardubice, had been operated by another Tu-204 (RA-64047) and was carrying just eight crew members when it overran at Vnukovo.



flightglobal.com

Tu-204 directive warns pilots to check thrust-reverse status

Russian authorities have ordered immediate action by Tupolev Tu-204 operators in the wake of two runway overruns by Red Wings aircraft, including the fatal accident at Moscow Vnukovo.

Federal aviation authority Rosaviatsia has issued an airworthiness directive highlighting the 29 December crash at Vnukovo - in which five crew members were killed - and an incident on 20 December during which another Red Wings Tu-204 rolled beyond the end of the runway while landing at Novosibirsk.

Rosaviatsia says Tupolev has developed a technical response for Tu-204 and Tu-214 twinjets, powered by Aviadvigatel PS-90 engines, which centres on lubricating mechanisms linked to limit-switches on the landing-gear, notably during low-temperature operations.

But the authority has also ordered a temporary amendment to the aircraft operating manual regarding the operation of thrust-reversers on the type.

It points out that the crew should check for an early indication that the reverser system is operating correctly.

After touchdown, with the throttle reduced to idle and the spoilers deployed, the thrust-reverse control lever should normally be moved, over the course of 1-2s, initially to the 'small reverse' position.

The engine instrument panel should indicate, in yellow text, that the thrust-reverse lock has opened and then - with the symbol 'REV' in green text - that the reverser is active, says the manual.

Once the crew has confirmed this, and the correct alignment with the runway, the nose should be lowered and maximum reverse-thrust engaged. When the speed has reduced to 70-75kt (130-140km/h) the crew should restore the reverser control to the 'small reverse' position and, at about 25kt, disengage it.

But the operating manual specifically warns the crew to check that the reverser is active, with the presence of the green 'REV' indication, before committing to maximum reverse thrust.

If the indication does not appear after the control lever has been moved to the 'small reverse' position, the warning says, the pilots should "immediately" disengage the lever and continue the roll-out without reverse thrust.

The Novosibirsk incident involved a Red Wings Tu-204 registered RA-64049, which had arrived after flight WZ123 from Moscow Vnukovo.

Red Wings' flight WZ9268, a ferry service from Pardubice, had been operated by another Tu-204 (RA-64047) and was carrying just eight crew members when it overran at Vnukovo.



flightglobal.com

Boeing crosses 1,000-order mark with 737 Max

Boeing's 737 Max programme crossed over the 1,000-order mark after Aviation Capital Group (ACG) finalized an order in late December for 60 re-engined single-aisles.

The $6 billion deal at list prices for 50 737 Max 8s and 10 737 Max 9s raises Boeing's total order book for the 737 Max to 1,029 aircraft 15 months after launching the programme.

"Customers are expressing confidence in our ability to deliver improved performance on schedule," says Bob Feldmann, vice president and general manager of the 737 Max programme.

The 737 Max seeks to reduce fuel burn by 13% compared to existing competitors by adding the CFM Leap-1B engine, advanced technology winglets, and a streamlined tail cone.



flightglobal.com

Boeing reduces 747-8 weight, tweaks aileron setting

Boeing has dropped the empty weight of the latest 747-8 Freighters by 2.5t compared to the aircraft delivered a year ago and tweaked the aileron configuration to boost aerodynamic performance.

The improvements were revealed at an industry conference on 29 November by a Cargolux executive, who noted the long-awaited weight reduction arrived with the delivery of the carrier's sixth 747-8F in mid-November.

"Strangely, we're very happy" with the new aircraft's performance, Yves Germeaux said at the Ascend Aviation 2020 Finance Forum, a Flightglobal-sponsored event, in San Francisco.

Cargolux helped Boeing launch the 747-8F with the first order, but then refused to accept delivery of the first 747-8 for several weeks last year due to disputes about contractual guarantees. Another carrier, Atlas Air, cancelled orders for three 747-8Fs last year partly due to performance issues.

But the Luxembourg-based carrier's position appears to have softened with the latest arrival in its fleet.

"The performance, with [the improvements] all in mind, is quite close to what Boeing had in mind," Germeaux added.

In response, Boeing agreed "overall" with the Cargolux assessment of the performance of its sixth 747-8F, but also noted that some customers have reported a 1% fuel burn improvement compared to Boeing's promises.

Boeing has not publicly updated the empty weight specification on the 747-8F since December 2011. At that time, airport planning documents released by the airframer showed the baseline weight had already started decline since first delivery in October 2011, falling by 363kg (800lb) to 190.9t.

At the same time, Boeing increased maximum take-off weight for the 747-8 by 1.3% to 448t, based on the results of a flight loads survey that showed extra payload margin in the airframe.

Since that time, the Freighter model has also benefitted from improvements introduced with the certification of the passenger 747-8 Intercontinental model on 14 December 2011.

Boeing now says that the 747-8I added enhanced positioning of the fly-by-wire outboard aileron in cruise, and that feature was retrofitted on the 747-8F. More improvements are expected to be introduced next year, with the second performance improvement package (PIP 2) of the General Electric GEnx-2b engines.

Flightglobal senior reporter Edward Russell contributed to this article.

IN FOCUS: Very large airliners

Boeing's 747-8 programme passed a major milestone on 1 June, when the Intercontinental passenger variant entered revenue service with Lufthansa, flying from Frankfurt to Washington DC.

By the end of September, the German airline had received three of its 20 ordered ­747-8Is. A total of four aircraft of the type had been delivered to undisclosed VIP customers, the first having been handed over in February. Cargolux took delivery of the first 747-8 Freighter in October last year, and by September 30, Boeing's -8F output had reached 23.


Nippon Cargo 747-8 Boeing
 Boeing
Delivery of a 747-8F to Nippon Cargo Airlines marked the 747-8's Japanese debut

But there have been setbacks along the way. On 4 October, General Electric ordered inspections on all 120 GEnx engines operating on Boeing 747-8s and 787s to check for installation errors of a component now linked to an engine failure in China in September.

The service bulletin calls for a one-time inspection of the first stage low-pressure turbine (LPT) nozzle, a non-rotating part that directs the air flow into the trailing LPT stages. GE issued the bulletin four days after completing a teardown inspection of a GEnx-2B turbofan that was damaged during a rejected take-off by an AirBridge Cargo 747-8 in Shanghai.

The National Transportation Safety Board and the US Federal Aviation Administration initially linked the incident to two other LPT failures of GEnx engines in late July and early August. These were caused by cracks on the forward end of the fan midshaft, which connects the LPT to the inlet fan. But closer inspections of the AirBridge Cargo engine revealed no cracks or fractures of the fan midshaft, which pointed to an installation problem within the LPT itself.

GE has emphasised the GEnx engine family's reliable safety record, despite the high-profile contained engine failures on the 747-8 and 787. The engine fleet has achieved a dispatch rating of 99.9% with 225,000 flight hours in less than two years of service.

In September, the fan midshaft cracking and fracturing incidents were traced to a new, lead-free coating that allowed the component to corrode rapidly under certain conditions.

GE switched to a leaded coating already used on the GE90 to correct the problem. To ensure the performance of 747-8s delivered from 2014 will be "within 1%" of the original target, Boeing, in conjunction with GE, is working on a package of engine, aerodynamic and weight improvements to address all the issues. The 6-12 November issue of Flight International will include a full technical description of Boeing's 747-8.

The other contestant in the market for very large airliners, Airbus, has delivered 20 A380s this year - and is aiming at a figure of 30 for the full year. Emirates is set to get five more in 2012, while Thai Airways, Malaysia Airlines and Korean Air are also due to receive examples.

A met target of 30 would bring total A380 deliveries to 97 over the full life of the programme. Singapore Airlines has already received its initial complements of 19 A380s.

WING MODIFICATIONS
British Airways, due to receive its first superjumbo in July 2013, has opted to ensure its A380s are delivered from the outset with full-life wings, incorporating the modifications developed in the wake of a bracket-cracking problem on the type. The airline, which is taking a new 575t higher-weight version of the aircraft, will have the affected wing-rib bracket components replaced at Toulouse.

BA's A380 schedule enables the carrier to take advantage of the repair as well as the introduction of the permanent production wing from 2014. Airbus expects the permanent A380 wing fix to secure certification towards the end of this year.

VLA data

The European Aviation Safety Agency had, in June, determined that repetitive inspections were required on Airbus A380s to check for the cracking problem. Its directive was updated to require high-frequency eddy current inspections at intervals of 560 cycles, as well as an initial inspection within 1,300 cycles of first flight. Certain jets which have had lower panel rib boom sections replaced are subject to a slightly different inspection regime.

EASA deemed the revised inspection order an "interim action" pending approval of a permanent solution to the cracking problem, identified after cracks were initially discovered in a Qantas example and further inspections turned up problems on additional aircraft.

Lufthansa, meanwhile, has had its own issues with the A380. The German carrier has experienced a number of incidents of odours in the cabin air of Rolls-Royce Trent 900-­powered A380s, but cautions that it is not clear whether all of the events involved engine oil fumes. It plans to introduce onboard equipment to measure potential contamination levels on an ad hoc basis.

The carrier asked Rolls-Royce to develop a modification, which has now been installed on several engines in the airline's 10-strong A380 fleet. The modification comprises a cover for the bleed air extraction outlet, which should stop oil particles from entering the cabin air system. It is based in principle on a similar shield that was developed for Trent 500 engines on the Airbus A340-600.

The cabin odour issue appears to arise during engine start-up. Lufthansa is developing a new start-up procedure together with Airbus and Rolls-Royce, whereby the bleed air supply to the cabin will be temporarily interrupted as the engines spool up. This procedure has yet to be approved, however. In the meantime, airline technicians are manually cleaning the affected engine areas at short intervals to avoid any residual oil outside the regular lubrication system.

Lufthansa has contracted German research centre Fraunhofer Institute to develop portable measuring equipment to determine cabin air contamination levels.

For all the A380 programme's travails, dispatch reliability appears to be going in the right direction. At September's ILA air show in Berlin, Airbus underlined the positive effect of retrofit measures on various systems. A380 marketing head Richard Carcaillet said that these had raised the dispatch reliability rate by a percentage point, to 99.3%, from the beginning of 2012.

Thai A380 Airbus
 Boeing
Thai Airways International received its first A380 in September

The improvement had been notable during the course of delivery of the past 25 aircraft, he said. Modifications had been made to systems such as landing-gear door sensors which, he says, were "a bit too twitchy" as well as fuel pumps, electro-hydraulic actuators and door systems.



http://www.flightglobal.com 

IN FOCUS: Boeing 747-8 technical description & cutaway

More than four decades after Pan Am debuted the Boeing 747-100, a stretched variant of the world's original Jumbo Jet is finally plying the world's air routes. But by the time this bigger "seven-forty-seven" arrived, Airbus had already redefined the meaning of "Jumbo Jet" with its A380. So the battle for that "queen of the skies" crown was on.

Boeing had spent a decade evaluating ways to create a substantially larger 747, before decide in November 2005 not to let Airbus off the hook too easily. Scoped under the name "747 Advanced", the stretch was launched as the "747-8" to reflect the naming convention around the number eight adopted for the 787 then in development.

Along with the Dreamliner's designation came its General Electric GEnx engines - although featuring a conventional bleed system for air-conditioning.

Lufthansa 747-8I roll out MKJ/Flightglobal
 Max Kingsley-Jones/Flightglobal  
Lufthansa banged the drum for its new Jumbo when its first 747-8 arrived in May

The 747-8 was originally slated for service entry in 2009, but a series of programme delays, caused by development issues and a knock-on from the interruptions suffered by the 787 programme, meant the first stretched aircraft did not leave the ground until February 2010.

The new jet finally entered service - in freighter form - with Cargolux in October last year. The 747-8 Intercontinental passenger variant followed in June this year, debuting with Lufthansa.

The "big Boeing" is in effect a major derivative of the 747-400 that had been launched two decades earlier, which itself traces its DNA right back to the original Jumbo developed in the late 1960s by a team headed by industry legend Joe Sutter.

Now aged 91, Sutter has been officially retired from Boeing for more than 25 years, but retains an office at the company's Seattle headquarters so he can keep a watchful eye on the latest iteration of his precious creation.

"Joe's still as sharp as ever and we talk about the airplane a lot," says today's 747 chief project engineer Bruce Dickinson. "I welcome Joe's opinions and input."

Unlike some of the more ambitious studies of the 1990s, the definitive 747 stretch does not incorporate a major fuselage extension and enlarged wing. Instead, the fuselage has been treated with a modest stretch, with plugs fore and aft of an effectively all-new - but similarly sized - wing.

TYPE COMMONALITY
"About 70% by structural weight is new. In many respects, though, we could state almost all of the airplane is new, as we have heavier gauge materials that have similar construction as the 747-400," says Dickinson. "We strove for a lot of commonality in general, though, as it is a huge advantage to us for our installed fleet. You see that with a lot of our systems, where we've tried to keep it common."

Both freighter and passenger variants feature the same-sized plugs fore and aft, although this was not always the case. While both have 1.52m (60in) aft plugs, the 747-8I model initially had a shorter 2.03m forward plug. A year after its launch, Boeing adopted the -8F's 4.06m forward plug dimensions for the -8I, to further boost capacity.

Boeing 747-8I 3-view

This means that the stretch increases the overall length of both models to 76.3m. On the passenger variant, this raises nominal three-class seating capacity over the 747-400 by 51 seats to 467, while on the freighter, it allows for two additional pairs of 96x125in pallets on the main deck and three more pallets on the lower deck. Overall, the 747-8F has 16% more capacity than the 747-400F.

The decision to stretch the 747-8I further - which increased passenger capacity by 17 seats, but reduced range by about 270nm (500km) - did not have unanimous appeal. Emirates was evaluating the 747-8I at the time, having already ordered the 747-8F for its cargo arm, and wanted Boeing to concentrate on the range rather than capacity.

"We have made it clear to Boeing that we prefer the [original] stretch because of its greater range at maximum payload," said the airline's president Tim Clark.

"With Tim's Middle East to US West Coast type [range] hunger, that's the classic tension of trying to hit his sweet spot of the market," says Dickinson.

Boeing's decision to go with the larger -8I was vindicated shortly after, when Lufthansa became launch customer for the revised passenger version, with a deal for 20 747-8Is in November 2006.

HEAVY WEIGHT
The forward plugs in the 747-8I and -8F are inserted in slightly different positions within the fuselage (see below). The passenger model's plug is between doors one and two to extend both the main and upper decks, while the freighter's is inserted further aft, closer to the front of the wing box, which avoids what would be a pointless increase in the length of the unused upper deck.

 ALL-CHANGE ON THE INSIDE
There is a stark contrast between the experience passengers have when stepping into the new Boeing 747 family, and that of the flightcrew. While the cabin has undergone a significant, 787-inspired makeover, the flightdeck will feel very familiar to 747-400 pilots.
747-8 Interior MKJ/Flightglobal
(From top) 747-8's flightdeck has much -400 commonality; upper-deck cabin is longer; staircase has had a makeover
The cabin interior includes a curved, upswept architecture that provides a greater feeling of space and comfort, and more stowage space. Boeing says the new light-emitting diode lighting technology is designed to create a bright airy ambience and to enable smooth transitions from light to dark.
An important change is the elegant sweeping staircase, which leads to the enlarged upper deck. Located adjacent to door two, it is also designed to improve passenger flows between the two decks during turnaround.
This change is significant as the stretch creates an upper-deck cabin that is similar in size to the main cabin of a 737-300/700. In a typical three-class layout, Boeing says that 48 business class seats can be accommodated on the 747-8I's upper deck, compared with 40 on the -400.
Adding to the ambience is a revised passenger window design. The 747-8I's cabin windows are 388mm (15.3in) tall and 273mm wide, giving an estimated 8% increase in the usable viewing area. "We transitioned to a more oval-shape window and reveal, which is modelled after that of the 777," says 747 chief product engineer Bruce Dickinson.
AT HOME
Pilots of the 747-400 will feel right at home in the -8's flightdeck, which is equipped with a Rockwell Collins avionics and display suite.
There are some revisions such as a new Honeywell flight management computer and 777-style electronic checklist, cursor control panel, multi-function displays and air traffic control datalink. It also has a new maintenance terminal and a revised central maintenance computer.
An interesting development for the 747 VIP market is the Aeroloft, designed by Greenpoint Technologies specifically for the 747-8, which has been chosen by some customers. The Aeroloft offers eight private sleeping berths and a changing room and is located above the main cabin aft of the upper deck.
The 747-8 has a much heavier weight capability than its predecessor, with a maximum take-off weight just shy of the "1 million lb" threshold at 987,000lb (447,700kg). This puts it 51t above the -400. 
 
The aircraft's maximum take-off weight was increased by around 6t during testing after a flight loads survey revealed that additional structural margin was available.

Boeing said the MTOW increase was not aimed specifically at restoring payload/range capability lost as a result of the growth in structural weight during development.

Boeing focused on weight reduction during the design phase through the use of new materials.

There is extensive use of carbonfibre in secondary structures, while the fuselage incorporates new advanced aluminium alloys throughout its length (other than the passenger doors), as does the wing. A weight-saving effort is expected to bring later aircraft close to the original empty-weight target.

Aside from the stretch, there is little visual difference between the -8 fuselage and earlier marks. But the same is not true for the wing.

"The wing is key to this airplane, combined with the GEnx engines, and what makes it so dramatically different from its predecessors," says Dickinson.

"There's the advanced technology airfoil with the supercritical wing and raked wingtip designed using computational fluid dynamics, giving it the same technology level as the 787 wing. It is extremely efficient."

The wing shares little with the 747-400 other than its 35˚ sweep and incorporates new materials that help reduce weight.

The design features an optimised reloft and retwist, while the raked tip (in place of the winglet on the -400) increases wing span by 4m to 68.4m.

"The new wing has similar dimensions to the earlier wing, but it is quite different. We really did not use any of the earlier aerodynamic features," says Dickinson.

Although he declines to reveal the area of the new wing for competitive reasons, Lufthansa quotes a figure of 554m².

The wing incorporates revised leading and trailing edge high-lift devices while fly-by-wire outboard ailerons "enable the wing to be even more efficient with the weight reduction, by providing manoeuvre load alleviation, which is new for the 747. This gives us a significant advantage for weight."

The ailerons are optimised to span-load in cruise flight and Boeing has introduced a droop capability as a performance improvement. "We developed this initially on the Intercontinental and have since introduced it on the Freighter," says Dickinson.

"We realised during -8I flight-testing that we had the opportunity to better position the aileron to optimise span-loading and discovered a 0.4% improvement, which is a pretty significant number."

WING CHANGES
The wing's major changes centre on the flaps. "Optimising the trailing edge is a real opportunity for performance," says Dickinson.

All earlier marks (except the 747SP "shrink") incorporate triple-slotted trailing-edge flaps, but the -8 has adopted a double-slotted inboard and single-slotted outboard design, which extend on redesigned tracks and new carriages.

The leading-edge variable camber Krueger flaps have also been redesigned to incorporate a gapped configuration. Actuation systems are unchanged. The spoilers are also now fly-by-wire.

747-8 v 747-400

Boeing spent a lot of time during flight-testing optimising the flap settings to improve on the approach speeds, which is "always a challenge, but we did this successfully".

Dickinson says that "fundamentally, the wing's structural design is not entirely different" from earlier variants, although advanced aluminium alloys are incorporated in the wing and carbon composites are used for the trailing edge and raked tip.

During development, the changes to the 747 airfoil design created a variety of new problems. Speaking at the time, the programme's then chief engineer Michael Teal explained: "When we changed the wing airfoil and ultimately changed the centre of gravity, it fundamentally shifted how the whole aircraft balances loads.

As the loads shifted back on the wing, the tail is the balancing load. So we changed more parts in the tail. Then the loads in the aft body changed, so we had to change the aft body."

The knock-on effect was that the 747-8 supply chain was thrust into limbo as it waited to adjust tooling and this contributed to the two-year programme delay.

"After we put that issue behind us, no follow-up was required since I joined the programme," says Dickinson.

The wing side-of-body has the same basic overall geometry and construct to the -400, but "has been 'gauged up' to account for the increased loads on the 747-8", Dickinson says. "The fairings are unchanged in basic geometry. However some changes to material, gauge and local geometry were required due to increased loads, systems changes, increased tyre size and environmental control system [ECS] pack temperature differences."

Dickinson says that there are no significant differences in the primary structure of the tail section. "The materials have been updated and gauges changed slightly. But we did adopt a double-hinged lower rudder."

NASA TECHNOLOGY
Power comes from four GEnx-2B67 engines rated at 66,500lb-thrust (296kN), which although derived from the 787's GEnx-1B, are optimised for the 747-8. The engines share the same core and 80% of the line replaceable units. The GEnx-2B incorporates a 2.67m fan, digital bleed control and a new pre-cooler. The four engines are suspended from a new pylon design and wrapped in nacelles that make extensive use of carbonfibre.

Boeing 747-8I cutaway 640

The 787-style noise-reducing "saw-tooth" chevrons are incorporated into both the trailing edge of the fan cowls and inner core engine nozzles. These NASA-developed devices smooth the hot air as it flows from the engine core and mixes with cooler air from the fan, reducing the noise-creating turbulence.

The 747-8I has a 30% smaller noise footprint than its predecessor, being approved for quota count 2 (QC2) take-offs and QC1 arrivals at the London airports.

GE says that the GEnx-2B is designed to have 13% better fuel efficiency over the CF6 engine, which powers the 747-400. However, the performance fell short of the original target and GE is working on a performance improvement package (PIP) to close the gap (see below).

Revisions and updates were made to the 747 systems on the new family. "We're heating and cooling slightly larger volumes and we've used different suppliers," says Dickinson.

The aircraft features a revised ECS and changes to the electrical and hydraulic systems. Liebherr Group's Liebherr-Aerospace Toulouse division supplies the ECS, which takes its air from the GEnx-2Bs.

The system uses new technologies to improve performance. These include an integrated air system controller and high-pressure water separation which dry the air within the air cycle machine upstream of the turbine section input. The ECS also incorporates an advanced bleed system and subfreezing packs.

With an MTOW 13% greater than the -400's, the 747-8 is equipped with a strengthened and revised landing gear supplied by Goodrich. The main landing gear (MLG) struts and wheels have been strengthened and the truck beam length revised. The wheel well has been adapted for the new gear geometry, while the MLG has modified doors and incorporates an alternative extend mechanism. The 18 wheels feature new tyres and brakes.

Modification was made to the shape of the wing MLG doors after a buffet issue was discovered following flight-testing. "Testing always uncovers a lot of interesting things," says Dickinson.

DOOR REDESIGN
The original door was derived from the -400's, but the changes to the wing and trailing edge created "a body/wing interface that we didn't fully appreciate. Once the source of the aerodynamic issue was discovered, we were able to work our way through that", he says.

The change centred on the size and position of the lower part of the door, which is now at a reduced angle to the vertical.

The door-buffet issue was resolved during flight-testing before the first 747-8I joined the flight-test programme on 20 March 2011. The passenger variant was awarded US Federal Aviation Administration certification on 14 December 2011 and the first delivery - to an undisclosed VIP customer - took place on 28 February. This marked the first delivery of a passenger 747 for seven years.

The 747-8F has been the lead variant in both development and sales, with total orders standing at 70 from eight customers. Since the landmark Lufthansa deal in 2006, sales of the 747-8I to airlines have been sluggish, with just three more customers added to date: Air China (five), Arik Air (two) and Korean Air (five). A further nine 747-8Is have been ordered by undisclosed customers for the VIP role (of which four have been delivered). Russian carrier Transaero signed a preliminary agreement for four 747-8Is last year but has yet to firm up the deal.

Lufthansa debuted the new Jumbo on 1 June between Frankfurt and Washington DC after taking delivery of what was the 1,443rd 747 off the line on 25 April. And guess who was keeping a watchful eye on proceedings at the handover in Everett? The 747-8's very proud grandfather... Joe Sutter.

BOEING AND GE FOCUS ON PERFORMANCE BOOST
Boeing advertises the 747-8 as having 10% lower seat-mile costs than the 747-400 and 2% lower trip costs. But maximising the new Jumbo's efficiency has become a slog after early-build aircraft came in overweight and the General Electric GEnx-2B missed its original fuel-burn target by 2.7%.
Boeing, in conjunction with GE, is working on a package of engine, aerodynamic and weight improvements to address all the issues and ensure that the performance of 747-8s delivered from 2014 will be "within 1%" of the original target, says chief project engineer Bruce Dickinson.

TARGETS SET
 "For the current as-delivered airplanes, we are consistently seeing a real-world fuel burn that is 1% better than our forecast. So with the increment for the PIP [performance improvement package] engine - which is audited to be a 1.6% improvement above today - it puts us right on track to meet our as-promised performance," he says.

Dickinson says GE is "bullish" that it can beat the 1.6% targeted for the PIP. Testing for the package will begin in mid-2013 and approval is scheduled for the end of next year.

One improvement that will be incorporated in the PIP for the freighter is a higher-thrust rating for use at hot and high airports. "This gives up to 4% additional thrust and will provide great capability for a number of city pairs such as Mexico City-Bogata or from airports in China," says Dickinson.

747-8I engines MKJ/Flightglobal
Max Kingsley-Jones/Flightglobal   
All-new: GEnx-2B engines and redesigned wing deliver big performance gains

In parallel with GE's PIP, Boeing has a weight-saving programme targeting a 2,270kg (5,000lb) reduction and is working on aerodynamic improvements. One aspect of the latter is the aileron droop, which has already been introduced on the 747-8I.

Other efficiencies being developed include improved nacelle leakage and rigging improvements around the aft end - primarily the rudder - to reduce cruise drag. There are other "study items" under evaluation, says Dickinson.

"We're always looking for minor improvements - a 10th here and a 10th there - as the production line becomes more consistent and stable. Virtually all the improvements can be retrofitted, although some could be a little time-consuming to do."

One item at the top of Dickinson's to-do list is the re-activation of the -8I's 12,500 litre (3,300 USgal) tailplane fuel tank. An analytical model showed that in certain scenarios, a flutter condition could occur when fuel is in the tank, so the decision was taken to disable the tank prior to certification.
"We're on track to work our way through that and get it certified and activated with some relatively minor changes," says Dickinson.

The other main focus of improvements is around the flight management computer, for which a series of upgrades is being introduced.

"We rolled in the 'FMC 2.5' load around August, which addresses some nuisance warnings but the real motivation was to activate the FMC V speeds," says Dickinson. "'FMC 2.6' will be introduced at the end of the year to provide a tweak to those V speeds - and is something that will be able to be applied to the 747-400."

A major update, dubbed "FMC 3.0", is scheduled for the end of 2013 and will "complete all the different nuances that the customers have asked for".

The upgrade will incorporate a host of new capabilities such as required navigation performance, a quiet climb function and "other bells and whistles features that will help the airplane operate slightly more efficiently and bring some other features into the airplane", Dickinson says.

Boeing will undertake a major flight-test programme in mid-2013 to clear the GEnx PIP, FMC 3.0 update and the modifications needed to reactivate the tail fuel tank. Approval of all these is due at the end of next year.




http://www.flightglobal.com/

Lufthansa cancels order for 747-8I test aircraft

Lufthansa has formally cancelled a Boeing 747-8I order after the manufacturer asked to retain the respective aircraft for internal purposes.

The aircraft in question, RC021, which is registered N6067U, was part of Boeing's three-strong flight-test fleet and used to test cabin systems such as air conditioning, galley and lighting equipment.
It has been furnished with Lufthansa's cabin interior and visited the German carrier's base in Frankfurt in December 2011 for promotional filming work and ground operational tests prior to the first delivery in April.

The aircraft, which is already painted in Lufthansa's basic colour scheme with a white fuselage, grey underside and blue vertical stabiliser, was to be delivered as the carrier's fifth 747-8I later in the year.
But Lufthansa revealed during the summer that it would only take four aircraft in 2012. Boeing wanted to keep the aircraft for internal purposes for two years, says the airline, and asked to "relieve" the delivery schedule.

The carrier originally ordered 20 747-8Is, which were to be delivered in batches of five every year through 2015.

Lufthansa says that it has decided, in the meantime, to cancel its order for RC021 "purely due to reasons of flexibility" but that the remaining balance of 15 747-8Is would be delivered as planned until 2015. The airline adds, however, that it might order a "factory-new" 747-8I at a later stage.


flightglobal.com

United juggles 787 international schedule on reliability issues

United Airlines has delayed the launch of the majority of its planned international flights on the Boeing 787, as it works with the airframer to improve aircraft reliability.

The Chicago-based Star Alliance carrier will begin flights between Los Angeles and Tokyo Narita on 3 January as planned but has delayed the launch of flights between Houston Intercontinental and Lagos, London Heathrow and Amsterdam, according to an employee newsletter. Service to Lagos will begin in "late January" instead of 3 January, London on 1 March instead of 4 February and Amsterdam on 24 February instead of 23 February.

United still plans to begin flights between Los Angeles and Shanghai Pudong on 30 March, and Denver and Tokyo Narita on 31 March.

"By delaying the LOS [Lagos] and LHR [London Heathrow] service, we will use this additional time to work with Boeing to continue to improve the reliability of the aircraft," says the airline in the newsletter.

A United 787 enroute from Houston to Newark diverted to New Orleans on 4 December due the failure of an electrical generator about 40min after take-off. The aircraft returned to service on 10 December.

Boeing and United have been investigating the cause of the failure but it is unclear as to the status of the investigation.

The airline received its sixth 787-8 from Boeing (N27901) on 27 December 2012, according to Flightglobal's Ascend Online database. It has orders for 50 of the type.

flightglobal.com

Indonesia’s Sky Aviation takes delivery of first SSJ100

Sky Aviation SSJ100. Courtesy, Superjet International
Indonesian carrier Sky Aviation has taken delivery of its first Sukhoi Superjet 100 (SSJ100). The aircraft will begin commercial operations by the end of the month.

The delivery—the first of 12 it has on order—comes less than a year after an SSJ100 crashed into an Indonesian mountainside during a demonstration flight in May. The accident, which has been attributed to human error, killed 45 people including several Sky Aviation representatives. Indonesia’s authorities granted the aircraft type certification in November.

“Earlier Indonesian aviation authorities validated the Type Certificate for the Sukhoi Superjet 100 aircraft,” Sukhoi said in a statement. “This validation confirms compliance of the SSJ100 to the certification requirements of the Indonesian Aviation Authority, allowing its export to Indonesia and operation by Indonesian airlines without restrictions.”

Sky Aviation was established in 2010. It operates charter and scheduled services from its base at Jakarta’s Halim Perdanakusuma International Airport.


atwonline.com

Woman Dies on American Airlines Flight From Brazil to Texas

A 25-year-old woman was pronounced dead shortly after her flight landed in Houston on Wednesday, diverted because she suffered a medical emergency.
The woman was on American Airlines flight 96 from Sao Paolo, Brazil to Dallas-Fort Worth Airport in Texas.
The airline told ABC News the flight was diverted to George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston after the woman became ill. The airline would not say what happened to her.
However, the Houston Police Department said that eight hours into the flight, the woman went into medical distress. Members of the flight crew, aided by a physician who happened to be on board, began performing emergency medical procedures as the plane changed course to land in Houston. Shortly after landing, the woman was pronounced dead.
There were no apparent signs of trauma or any indication of foul play. Her identity and cause of death have not been released pending notification of family members and autopsy results.
The 220 passengers and 14 crew members on the Boeing 777 departed Houston at 9:05 a.m.
In September, a 64-year-old woman on a Korean Airlines flight from Seoul, South Korea died on a flight bound for New York's John F. Kennedy Airport.
In June, a man died on a Kenya Airways flight from Amsterdam to Tanzania. The man was reportedly sweating and having seizures before flight but the plane took off anyway.
In that case, the cabin crew reportedly laid the body across three seats and partially covered it, but another passenger, Lena Pettersson, was forced to sit across the aisle from it for the rest of the flight.
"Of course, it was unpleasant, but I am not a person who makes a fuss," Pettersson told the Swedish tabloid Expressen.
She was given a partial refund from the airline, about half the cost of her ticket.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Passenger jet carrying 162 passengers punches a hole in another plane as they collide after landing

A Spirit Airlines plane carrying 162 passengers had a lucky escape on New Year’s Eve when it clipped another jet minutes after touching down at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport in Florida.

After a comfortable landing, the Spirit Airlines Airbus A-320 was taxiing to its gate when its left wing smashed into a US Airways Airbus A-320, which was parked in a remote area away from the gate where aircraft are stored overnight. No one was on board the US Airways flight at the time.

‘After landing and while taxiing to the gate, our aircraft made contact with another parked aircraft,’ said Spirit spokeswoman Misty Pinson. ‘There were no injuries and customers deplaned at the gate as normal.’

Authorities say the US Airways aircraft was left with a gash in its tail section
Authorities say the US Airways aircraft was left with a gash in its tail section

A spokesperson for Spirit has confirmed that all 162 passengers on board got off at the gate as normal, and the plane has returned to service
A spokesperson for Spirit has confirmed that all 162 passengers on board got off at the gate as normal, and the plane has returned to service

Authorities say the US Airways aircraft was left with a gash in its tail section. Firefighters were called to the scene, but there was no fuel leaking from either aircraft.

While the Spirit aircraft has already resumed flying, the US Airways plane is out of service for inspection and repair of its damaged tail cone.

‘An A320 was parked in an approved parking spot when it was struck in the tail by another aircraft,’ US Airways spokesman Andrew Christie told CNN. ‘The extent of the damage is yet to be determined.’
 
The National Transportation Safety Board made a recommendation in September that large planes and other aircraft on which the wingtips are not easily visible from the cockpit should have cameras or other devices to monitor the wings.

At the time it said there had been 12 accidents since 1993 involving large aircraft's wingtip hitting another airplane or object on the taxiway.

Other recent collisions include a Boeing 747 hitting a regional jet at O'Hare airport in Chicago in May, a 767 hitting a regional jet in Boston in July 2011 and an A380 hitting a regional jet in April of 2011 at JFK airport in New York. No one was injured in any of these incidents. 

While the Spirit aircraft has already resumed flying, the US Airways plane is out of service for inspection and repair of its damaged tail cone
While the Spirit aircraft has already resumed flying, the US Airways plane is out of service for inspection and repair of its damaged tail cone


The incident occurred at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport in Florida
The incident occurred at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport in Florida




http://www.dailymail.co.uk/

United Technologies Is Looking Good in 2013

Responding to big promises from Boeing and Airbus, about a big market for commercial airplanes over the next few decades, United Technologies  has bought Goodrich... but sold both off Pratt & Whitney Power Systems, and UTC Power as well, saying it wants to focus on its "core aerospace and commercial businesses." It gets a Fool to wondering -- is United Tech up to something?
Actually, Fool contributor Rich Smith thinks it just might be. Listen in as he explains how UTX is moving to rearrange its business, and boost its profit margins, dramatically in the new year.

Boeing Soars Past Airbus in Deliveries

Strong sales of its 787 Dreamliner pushed Boeing ahead of European rival Airbus in 2012.Zoom
dapd
Strong sales of its 787 Dreamliner pushed Boeing ahead of European rival Airbus in 2012.

For the first time in a decade, Boeing has surpassed Airbus in deliveries of passenger jets. Experts blame strategic errors and the influence of politics at the US planemaker's European competitor. 

At the last Farnborough Air Show in Britain in July, Boeing came up with a unique idea. For almost 30 years, the company had always left its passenger planes on the ground at major air events where industry representatives meet. At Farnborough, though, a Boeing 787 with Qatar Airways' livery droned over spectators' heads. The performance jibed nicely with Boeing's overall performance, and the company stole the show from Airbus, securing billions of dollars worth of orders.

 
In fact, 2012 went so well for Boeing that the American company has now surged ahead of its European rival Airbus in deliveries. According to analysts' calculations, Boeing now carries the prestigious title of being the world's largest deliverer of passenger jets. The reason for the success is the 787, or Dreamliner, which had been plagued for years with development and production problems.
With its high share of carbon fiber, particularly in the tail, the 787 was meant to revolutionize aircraft construction. But the first Dreamliners were delivered in 2011, after a three-year delay. Then engine trouble and loose parts on the tail resulted in negative headlines for the company. In December 2012, the American air safety regulatory agency, the FAA, ordered that all US Dreamliners be inspected for fuel leaks.
Now it appears that Boeing has ironed out the initial glitches in its Dreamliner program, though. Between July and September 2012 alone, the company managed to increase its production capacity to deliver 12 of the aircraft. "Boeing has resolved most of the problems it was having with the Dreamliner," said Heinrich Grossbongardt, an independent German aviation expert, and now the company is working hard to fulfill its long list of orders. Boeing has also increased production capacity on its mid-haul 737 jets.
Boeing Also Ahead with Orders
Counting all of its models, Boeing delivered 537 aircraft to customers between January and the end of November, compared to only 516 at Airbus, meaning that the Chicago-based company surpassed its European rival for the first time since 2002. A decade ago, Airbus caught up with his rival and had secured the slot at the helm each year since. In 2011, for example, Airbus delivered 534 jets to customers, compared to Boeing's 477.
But now the American company has caught up -- with Boeing also appearing to pass up Airbus in the number of orders it booked in 2012. By Dec. 18, Boeing had recorded 1,115 orders compared to just 585 at Airbus through the end of November.
Aviation analyst Grossbongardt blames strategic errors at Airbus for the company's decline in orders. The European planemaker has concentrated in recent years largely on the A380 super jumbo jet. The company didn't receive a single order for the A380 at Farnsborough, though. Officials at Airbus believe problems with hairline cracks in the aircraft's wings are leading airlines to hold back on purchases. However, sales chief John Leahy has admitted that the market for large aircraft has also weakened.
In contrast to Airbus, Boeing has been considerably more cautious in its assessment of the market for widebody aircraft. The US company did bring to market a pepped up new version of the classic 747 jumbo jet, which has been rechristened the 747-8, but its main focus has been on more flexible models. Grossbongardt argues that this strategy is now paying off. The Boeing 777 has been a major hit in terms of sales, and last year the company surpassed the 1,000 mark for deliveries of the aircraft.
"When it comes to two-engine planes, Boeing has steered ahead of Airbus with the 777," Grossbongardt said. With nearly 400 seats, it offers airlines greater capacity and large maximum range with the lower operating costs of a two-engine plane. "It allows airlines to be much more flexible in planning because the advantages of jumbo jets are only felt when they are totally full," Grossbongardt said, explaining the secret of the Boeing model's success.
'A Lot of Testosterone at Play'
Airbus has been very successful with its A320 family of short-haul jets, but they are much smaller than the 777. Now the Europeans want to better compete in the twin-engine, widebody market with the new A350, which will be built using very light materials. But the new long-range jet has been delayed and the first delivery is not expected until 2014. Grossbongardt said this means Boeing will likely be able to maintain its leading edge until the end of the decade.
But the fact that executives at Airbus concentrated so myopically on the A380 jumbo jet was also a product of politics at parent company EADS, where the French and German governments hold considerable sway. "There was a lot of testosterone at play in the conception of the A380," Grossbongardt said. "Politicians wanted to prove a point to the United States and show that the Europeans were capable of building the world's largest aircraft." Airbus succeeded in the latter, but the A380 so far hasn't proven to be the best-seller many had hoped for.
Still, even if the title for world's biggest aircraft deliverer has already been bestowed, 2012 marked an important strategic development for Airbus, Grossbongardt said. A restructuring of shareholdings at parent company EADS is expected to diminish the influence of Paris and Berlin on operations. "In the future, decisions at EADS will have a greater entrepreneurial focus," Grossbongardt said. And that will be necessary, too. Boeing is currently showing profits of between 9 and 10 percent of turnover, compared to earnings of just 2 percent at Airbus.
Grossbongardt predicts the aircraft manufacturer will catch up again in the passenger jet market, though. "It has been a head-to-head race between Boeing and Airbus and it will remain that way," he said.



http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/dreamliner-versus-the-a380-boeing-soars-past-airbus-in-deliveries-a-875579.html 

CIT Places Firm Order for 10 Airbus A350 XWB Aircraft

 U.S.-based bank holding company CIT Group Inc. (CIT) has signed an order for 10 Airbus A350-900 aircraft, the aircraft maker said Thursday.

Airbus, a unit of European Aeronautic Defence & Space Co. NV (EAD.FR), said it is the second time that CIT has ordered A350 XWBs, or Xtra Wide-Body, a new mid-size long-range aircraft.

"This order for Airbus A350 XWBs will further expand our portfolio of medium- to long-haul aircraft," said C. Jeffrey Knittel, president of CIT Transportation Finance.

On the basis of list prices for A350-900s, the deal was valued at $2.77 billion.


Boeing to overtake Airbus jet deliveries

(Financial Times) -- Boeing is set to overtake Airbus for the first time in a decade by delivering more passenger jets to customers in 2012, primarily because the US manufacturer is cranking up production of its 787 Dreamliner after years of delay.
Four analysts estimated Boeing's jet deliveries to airlines and leasing companies would exceed those of Airbus in 2012, adding the US company should maintain its lead over its European rival until at least 2015.
As the two manufacturers increase production of single- and twin-aisle aircraft significantly over the coming three years in response to strong demand, Boeing and EADS, Airbus' parent, are well placed to boost shareholder returns.
However, both groups are facing questions about how long they can sustain their higher production rates.
Nick Cunningham, analyst at Agency Partners, predicted the two manufacturers would cut aircraft production after 2015.
"Aircraft orders have either peaked or are about to peak for Airbus and Boeing, and the historical trend tells us that the peak in aircraft deliveries will follow within two or three years," he said.
Boeing is expecting to supply customers with up to 600 aircraft in 2012, compared with Airbus' forecast of 580 jet deliveries.
In the 11 months to November 30, Boeing delivered 537 aircraft to customers, while Airbus supplied 516.
This past year could mark the first time Boeing has surpassed Airbus' deliveries since 2002 -- when the European manufacturer was seeking market parity with its US rival. For the previous 30 years, Boeing consistently delivered more aircraft to customers than Airbus.
Although Boeing and Airbus continue to dominate the passenger jet market, their duopoly is under increasing threat from smaller players including Comac, the fledgling Chinese aircraft maker.
Against this backdrop, Boeing and EADS are seeking to put themselves into a position to return more cash to shareholders.
On December 17, Boeing announced a 10 per cent increase in its quarterly dividend and a share buyback because of the group's "positive growth outlook".
EADS is planning a share buyback alongside a proposed restructuring of its state shareholders. The EADS board is this year expected to consider the case for increasing the group's dividend.
Research and development spending at Boeing and Airbus should fall in the coming years, because their new widebody aircraft programmes are going into production.
Boeing is well ahead of Airbus in this respect -- the US manufacturer delivered 35 twin-aisle 787s to customers in the first 11 months of 2012. The first 787 was supplied three years late to ANA, the Japanese airline, in 2011.
Airbus is only due to deliver the first of its planned A350 widebody aircraft in 2014.
Boeing's shares rose just 3 per cent in 2012, amid concerns about whether it could increase aircraft production -- particularly the 787 -- without glitches.
EADS' shares, by contrast, rose 22 per cent, as Airbus improved its underlying operating margin to 3.3 per cent in the nine months to September 30, compared with 1.3 per cent in the equivalent prior period.

Commerical jetliner's wingtip clips parked plane's tail

Two commercial aircraft sustained damage Monday night at Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport when the wingtip of one clipped the tail section of the other, according to Broward Sheriff Fire Rescue.

It happened just before 10 p.m. in a remote area of the airfield at 300 Terminal Drive, in Fort Lauderdale.

An investigation determined that the damage to the left wing of a Spirit Airlines Airbus A-320 occured as it clipped a parked US Airways Airbus A-320 while taxiing in earlier, Fire Rescue spokesman Mike Jachles said.

The US Airways aircraft was parked in a remote area away from the gate, where aircraft are parked overnight, when it sustained a gash in the tail section, he said.

It appears the left wing of the Spirit Airlines plane clipped the tail section of the parked US Airways jet, Jachles said.

There was no fuel leak from either aircraft and no injuries were reported. The Broward County Aviation Department and Broward Sheriff Fire Rescue responded to the scene of the collision and a full investigation was anticipated.



http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2012-12-31/news/fl-planes-bump-at-airport-20121231_1_tail-spirit-airlines-remote-area 

Spirit Airlines Flight Bumps Up Against Parked US Airways Plane On Its Way To The Gate

Can you still call it a fender-bender if there are no fenders involved, and instead it’s two giant skybirds (you might know them as airplanes) having a run-in in the runway?** Or is it just a quick clip? In any case, no one was hurt and since the Spirit Airlines flight had just landed when it ran into a parked US Airways plane, passengers likely didn’t have to suffer a huge delay.
The Spirit Airlines Airbus A-320 bumped up against a US Airways plane of the same make  where it was parked far from the usual daily airport hubbub at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport on Monday night, reports the Florida Sun Sentinel.
The Spirit flight had just landed on its way from Atlanta with 162 passengers and was taxiing to the gate.
Both planes sustained damage when the left wingtip of the Spirit flight bonked the US Airways plane, but officials are investigating how exactly the Spirit flight was even close enough to do so.
The US Airways craft suffered a gash in the tail section, while the Spirit plane’s wing was damaged by its run-in with the other plane. However, the Spirit Airbus was able to return to service shortly afterward.

*Pictured plane wasn’t involved in the incident.
**Runway was used just for alliterative purposes. Neither aircraft was on an active runway.


http://consumerist.com/2013/01/02/spirit-airlines-flight-bumps-up-against-parked-us-airways-plane-on-its-way-to-the-gate/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=t.co  

Chinese, Taiwan Airlines to Challenge Cathay in Alliance

China Southern Airlines Co. (1055) is among four carriers from China and Taiwan to form a regional alliance to challenge Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. (293) as warmer cross-strait ties spur demand for direct flights.
Frequent travelers of any alliance member can redeem miles for tickets and enjoy rewards such as free use of business lounges from any of the four carriers, according to a joint statement by the airlines. The grouping also includes China Eastern Airlines Corp., the nation’s largest carrier by passenger numbers after China Southern, Taoyuan, Taiwan-based China Airlines Ltd. (2610) and Xiamen, China-based Xiamen Airlines Co.
Closer business and political ties between China and the island has spurred travel demand, prompting airlines across the strait to add more capacity in the high-yielding market, according to the CAPA Centre for Aviation, which advises airlines. The regional alliance would also challenge Hong Kong- based carriers such as Cathay Pacific in the cross-strait market, the consultant said.
The alliance will account for half of the capacity directly between China and Taiwan by offering more than 270 round-trip flights every week, according to the statement. It also offers 280 cross-strait round-trip flights via Hong Kong every week.
Cathay Pacific and its Hong Kong Dragon Airlines Ltd. unit offer about 128 flights from Hong Kong to Taipei every week, according to the carrier’s website.
For China’s three biggest airlines, yields for flights to Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macau are higher than domestic and international routes, according to CAPA.
Taiwan has been ruled separately from China since 1949 when members of the Kuomintang party fled to the island after a civil war with Communist forces. Relations between Taiwan and China reached their warmest in more than six decades after Taiwan President Ma Ying-jeou took office in May 2008. He focused on economic ties and dropped the pro-independence stance of his predecessor.
The airlines in the new alliance are all SkyTeam members. Cathay Pacific is a member of the Oneworld alliance.


http://www.bloomberg.com 

Boeing C-17 program in Long Beach gets $895 million upgrades contract


LONG BEACH - For the next decade, Boeing Co. employees in Long Beach will provide technological enhancements to the U.S. Air Force's fleet of C-17 airplanes.
Government officials recently awarded Boeing a $895 million contract to provide software and hardware upgrades to the C-17 Globemaster III weapon system, according to the U.S. Department of Defense.
The contract is the latest good news for the endangered production line, following a string of foreign deals, as U.S. military orders have ceased.
"Boeing is pleased to support the U.S. Air Force with operational enhancements for the C-17 Globemaster III advanced airlifter," Boeing said in a statement Wednesday. "The recent contract announcement provides integrated software, hardware upgrades and development efforts to the C-17 during the next 10 years. C-17s are the backbone of the Air Force, and these enhancements further support the most advanced airlift capabilities in the world."
A Boeing spokeswoman said the work will be based in Long Beach through Dec. 27, 2022, but that no new workers will be hired. Company officials, she said, remain "focused on meeting the demand for affordable, reliable and capable airlift globally and do not anticipate changes to employment as a result of this award."
This is among a handful of contracts recently awarded by the Air Force, including a contract in October 2012 to provide support services such as planning, purchasing and material

 management through the C-17's Integrated Sustainment Program.
The program, which started in 1998 with 42 aircraft, now covers 246 worldwide, with the latest contract covering fiscal years 2013 through 2017, according to Boeing.
The contracts are a glimpse of Boeing's future in Long Beach for at least the next 10 years.
About 250 C-17s have been manufactured for use worldwide, including 218 for the the U.S. Air Force, since 1991. The C-17 is valued for its versatility as one of the largest cargo and personnel transport planes with the capability of taking off and landing on short, rough runways.
However, for years dwindling domestic demand has threatened to shut down the program, which employs more than 4,000 people in Long Beach.
To help preserve the assembly line, Boeing officials in 2010 reduced the production rate of the C-17s from 15 to 10 annually.
Meanwhile, they have been seeking out foreign customers, who are buying at least 60 percent of the C-17s that are now being made. Boeing has already wooed buyers in the United Kingdom, Canada, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Australia and, most recently, India, which ordered 10 C-17s. The countries have been using the planes on humanitarian and disaster relief missions.
Current orders, which include India's and the remaining domestic order, take the production line up through the third quarter of 2014.



http://www.dailybulletin.com

Airlines expected to increase fees

U.S. Airlines are expected to sock us with even more fare hikes and fees in the New Year. However, analysts say we'll probably pay less for gasoline. 

Analysts predict major airlines will raise fares at least a dozen times this year and they will invent even more of those add on fees.

Last year, airlines raised fares seven times and they earned a record $1.5 billion in baggage and change fees. High prices didn't stop us from flying though, so expect more fees this year.

On a brighter note, it should be cheaper to drive. Gas prices are expected to drop due to a bigger oil supply and lower demand.




http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/7_on_your_side&utm_medium=referral&id=8940195&utm_source=t.co

Rudest airlines? United's naughty, Frontier's nice

Two of Denver International Airport’s biggest carriers rank at the opposite ends of a new survey on rude airline employees by Airfarewatchdog.com.

The travel website asked just over 1,000 domestic air travelers to share their thoughts on which airlines have the rudest workers.

United Airlines, DIA’s largest carrier, was picked by 21 percent of those surveyed as having surly employees, behind only American Airlines (25 percent), a smaller player at the Denver airport, and ahead of Delta Air Lines (18 percent), US Airways (12 percent) and Spirit Airlines (10 percent).
On the other hand, Denver-based Frontier Airlines — No. 3 at DIA — tied with Alaska Airlines, JetBlue Airways and Virgin America as having the nicest workers out of 12 airlines in the poll, with only 2 percent of passengers surveyed by Airfarewatchdog.com saying their employees are rude.

Southwest Airlines (No. 2 at DIA) landed in the lower end of the rudeness pack, mentioned by 6 percent of those surveyed.


http://www.bizjournals.com

Pakistan Airlines Seeks State Aid After Years of Losses

Pakistan International Airlines Corp. (PIAA), the flag carrier reeling from seven straight years of losses, sought financial assistance from the government for at least a third time since 2007 to pare debt.
The carrier, known as PIA, has asked for 25 billion rupees ($257 million) from the government, Managing Director Muhammad Junaid Yunus said in a Jan. 1 interview at his office in Karachi, Pakistan. The management is in talks with the finance ministry to raise the capital before March, he said.
Passengers board a Pakistan International Airlines aircraft in Saudi Arabia. Photographer: Banaras Khan/AFP/Getty Images
“I’m praying that we get this,” Yunus said. “This is a government airline, it’s a national asset.”
PIA plans to lease 12 fuel-efficient planes this year, Yunus said, as the company turns for funds to the government, which itself is trying to repair state finances after recording the highest budget deficit in two decades. South Asian carriers Air India Ltd. and SriLankan Airlines Ltd. have also won state funding amid competition from Emirates and Middle East carriers.
Pakistan’s national carrier got government loans of 25 billion rupees in 2007 and about 8 billion rupees in the year ended in June 2009, Yunus said.
“The cash injection won’t bring PIA out of trouble but it will still make things better for them,” said Khurram Schehzad, the Karachi-based head of research at brokerage Arif Habib Ltd. “The implementation of this should be gradual considering the looming elections and the coming budget.”
PIA fell 0.3 percent to 3.81 rupees at the close in Karachi, erasing a gain of as much as 5.5 percent. The benchmark KSE 100 index rose 0.6 percent. The stock more than doubled last year, ending eight straight years of annual declines.

Kingfisher Losses

Fuel costs and rising competition have also hurt other carriers in the region. The Indian government said it may provide as much as 300 billion rupees ($5.5 billion) to unprofitable Air India through 2020. Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. (KAIR), India’s second-biggest carrier by market share in 2011, has halted operations since October after five years of losses.
PIA plans to lease eight A320s and four turboprops, Yunus said. The Airbus planes would be used for services to cities including Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait and Mumbai. The company will raise bank loans to fund the fleet upgrade after government approval, he said.
The carrier has a debt of 150 billion rupees, Yunus said. PIA posted a loss of 26 billion rupees in 2011, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. It previously reported an annual profit in 2004.



http://www.bloomberg.com 

Airbus sweetens airplane deal with American Airlines (but we’re not sure how much)

American Airlines on Wednesday evening filed a motion in U.S. Bankruptcy Court that seeks approval to proceed with its purchase of Boeing and Airbus airplanes.
In the 20-page document, American indicates that Airbus has given it better terms than when the airline first announced the airplane deals in July 2011.
It sounds pretty good. But the good parts are all redacted. Here’s what is in the public version:
During the pendency of the chapter 11 cases, the Debtors have engaged in extensive discussions with each of Airbus and IAE with respect to their respective prepetition agreements and their ongoing relationship. These discussions have resulted in proposed amendments and modifications to the prepetition agreements with each of Airbus and IAE that would become effective upon the assumption of the agreements, as so amended, pursuant to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. These amendments and the benefits to the Debtors’ estates provided therein are summarized as follows:
Amendments to Airbus Agreements (the “Airbus Amendments”)
     – Airbus provides a net reduction [redacted]. The total savings to be realized by American from this reduction is approximately [redacted] through [redacted];
      — Airbus provides a reduction [redacted]; and
      — Airbus has agreed to a reduction [redacted] which American projects will result in cost savings aggregating approximately [redacted] through [redacted].
Accordingly as set forth above, the savings that could be realized from the Airbus Amendments through  [redacted] aggregate approximately [redacted], [redacted]. In addition, no cure amounts would be payable in connection with the assumption of the Airbus Agreements, [redacted].
That clears that up.
In the July 2011 order, American and Airbus said American would buy 130 airplanes from the current Airbus A320 family through 2017, and 130 of the next-generation A320neo airplanes beginning in 2017.
In Wednesday’s filing, American disclosed that it has options to buy more airplanes from the current-generation Airbus A320 family. How many? [Redacted]. It also has options to buy more of the Airbus A320neo family. How many and when? [Redacted and redacted].
The motion also asks for approval of the agreement between American and IAE International Aero Engines AG, which will supply engines for the Airbus aircraft. IAE is to pay a “fleet allowance” to American each time the carrier takes delivery of an Airbus airplane. The proposal would increase the fleet allowance, but the amount is [redacted].
In support of its request, American said “it is abundantly clear that assumption of the Airbus Agreement and IAE Agreement represents a sound exercise of the Debtors’ business judgment. The agreements are on extremely beneficial terms, very competitive in the industry and both agreements have been enhanced by the recent amendments. Moreover, assumption of the agreements will lock in the financial benefits, assure the timely delivery of aircraft critical to the Debtors’ fleet plan and income generating capacity and not impose any undue prejudice or burden on the Debtors’ estates or any party in interest.”

http://aviationblog.dallasnews.com 

Does a new Dreamliner come with a warranty?

Question: With the new Boeing 787 finally being delivered, I was wondering if new commercial aircraft come with a manufacturer's warranty like new cars do.
-- submitted by reader Bo Montgomery, Little Rock
Answer: Yes, there is a warranty period with new aircraft from the manufacturer. Additionally, when a new aircraft type is ordered the manufacturer provides maintenance, training, and certification help to the airline. The relationship between a manufacturer and an airline is a close one, including any issues that might arise during the warranty.
Q: How do pilots train to fly new aircraft, i.e. the Boeing 787? How much simulator time and actual flying time does a captain/copilot get prior to flying passengers? Is there a minimum numbers of required hours to be rated on new aircraft?
-- Name withheld, Nashville
A: The pilot-training curriculum varies depending on the operator, the past experience of the pilots and the requirements of the National Aviation Authority. If a pilot were flying a Boeing (B)777 and upgraded to the B787, the training requirement would be less (a transition course) than if a pilot were upgrading to the 787 from an Airbus A320 (an initial course).
There is an academic portion to the training including systems knowledge, performance, flight-management computer practice, and then a test. This usually takes 10 days to two weeks for an initial course, a transition course is less. After the academic portion, a trainee moves to an advanced training device similar to a flight simulator but with limited capability that does not move. This is where pilots practice procedures and computer entries to get accustomed to the new airplane's flight-management system. This portion of the training can be concurrent with or can follow the academic portion in approximately five sessions. Finally the full flight simulator is where the pilots learn to "fly" the airplane.
PHOTOS: Boeing Dreamliner's inaugural flight takes off
Modern full-flight simulators are extremely good at replicating the flight characteristics of the airplane. Manual flying skills, abnormal situations, emergency situations, and computer entry skills are practiced in the full flight simulator. The number of simulator sessions depends on the type of training (transition or initial). An initial course could include five or six simulator sessions followed by a check ride (test) then a line-oriented fight training (LOFT) session. The LOFT is included to let a pilot fly a couple of "normal" flights to get accustomed to the demands of normal situations. After successful completion of all this training a pilot then is paired with an instructor pilot to fly several days in passenger service. Once the instructor is satisfied with the pilot's skills in the new airplane he or she is certified as qualified.

Professional pilot training is very intense. During a training cycle, pilots are very focused on the training process. The days are long, the pressure is high, and the skill development is carefully documented. The training is very good and effective. There have been cases where pilots who were new to an airplane faced emergency or abnormal situations and handled them successfully.

MORE: Read previous columns
John Cox is a retired airline captain with U.S. Airways and runs his own aviation safety consulting company, Safety Operating Systems.